|
Home Obituary Philosophy Books Photographs Visitors' Book
In the same way, the enthusiasm we shared for humanism, with its exclusive belief in human rights, changed in the 1960s when we realized that there was more to life on Earth than the welfare of people. Human rights were not enough. We knew that if our grandchildren were to inherit an earth worth living on, the relentless growth of population, and the unending exploitation of the natural world, must cease. I think the fact that he was soon due to take his place among his peers concentrated his mind. He was much concerned about his maiden speech and sought my advice on the science of it. He wanted it to mark a change in the attitude of the second chamber – a change towards a better understanding of the environment. He delivered a radical speech that was refreshingly free of party political dogma. Before he gave it, only one other British politician had spoken clearly and seriously on global environmental affairs, and that was Margaret Thatcher. In her speeches to the Royal Society and to the United Nations Assembly, she was the first to warn of the dangers of global change that loomed in the next century. She predicted that the environment would eventually usurp the political agenda. John Prescott’s splendid speech at the Kyoto conference, nearly ten years later, confirmed her prediction, and our record in environmental affairs. We have been fortunate to have some of the world’s best environmental politicians and it is good to know that Henry was among them. We will always remember the way that he brought life into mere history. On one occasion, Henry told us of his aunt who lived in the Netherlands and who had had the Kaiser to tea one afternoon in 1918, when he was obliged to flee Germany. From his personal tales we began to see why England has such a struggle coming to terms with Europe. It is unusual to make close friends in the
seventh decade. Perhaps our unconscious recognition that it would not be
for long made it the more worthwhile. Even so, I wish that we had met earlier.
The few glimpses I had of his life in Tasmania and in advertising revealed
a man who was much after my own heart in other ways than green politics.
Old-fashioned dogma of the Left makes us think of Earls as belted and presiding
over thousands of acres of land. In fact Henry and Jenny’s home at Little
Cudworthy was comparable with Coombe Mill. He had worked as a BBC producer
and had enlivened the words of commercials; I can never now browse the shelves
of a supermarket without thinking of Henry’s campaign for ‘Mr Kipling’s exceedingly
good cakes’. He had a true feeling for the natural world and was a wonderful
companion to have on a walk through the countryside, someone with whom to
share the pleasure of its beauty and the pain of its degradation. He was
someone who knew how to be outrageous for a purpose. The Earl of Portland
died in 1977. Sandy and I take the gift of these last seven years’ acquaintance
with Henry and Jenny as something that has enriched our lives. We miss him
sorely.
|
|